IMPORTANT:THE ANGEL OAK TREE WILL NOT BE CUT DOWN

Please read the details before signing the online petition.

This site is intended to inform the public of an impending development that will CLEARCUT THOUSANDS OF TREES comprising the beautiful, dense forest surrounding the world famous Angel Oak Tree located on Johns Island, SC.

After destroying the forest—including hundreds of tree that are hundreds of years old—a 600-unit multi-family housing complex will be built within yards of The Angel Oak.

While the developer maintains The Angel Oak will NOT be harmed, this claim reveals a tragic lack of understanding. The surrounding forest has protected The Angel Oak from weather and human traffic for hundreds of years.

Cutting down this forest = killing the Angel Oak Tree ahead of its time.




Update: June 8, 2009


PLEASE NOTE: CCDRB MEETING RESCHEDULED

Let your voice be heard!

Commercial Corridor Design Review Board Meeting to Review Revised Proposal for Angel Oak Village


5:00 PM Thursday June 25, 2009
Third Floor Meeting Room at 75 Calhoun Street

Developer Robert Demoura of Angel Oak Village is putting forth another proposal for conceptual approval on the Angel Oak Village Development on Thursday June 25, 2009. The board typically opens the floor to community comments on the proposed design, so please come voice your opinion on the revised proposal that threatens the survival of our Angel Oak! A vote will be taken, so any and all community support will make a tremendous difference in protecting this historic landmark. Your presence will make a difference!

Commercial Corridor Design Review Board Agenda can be viewed Here





Update: April 10, 2009


Public Meeting Wednesday April 15, 2009 6:30 PM
Sea Island Apartments, 3672 Maybank Highway, John's Island
Questions: 843-559-1593 or 843-557-1850

Come meet with community members to discuss the latest developments in the proposed Angel Oak Village complex. This is a general planning meeting open to all community members who wish to participate in molding the future of John's Island.





Update: March 26, 2009


Please note: Commercial Corridor Design Review Board Meeting Rescheduled!
Thursday April 9, 2009 at 5:00 PM
Third Floor Meeting Room at 75 Calhoun St.

Come voice your opinion on the latest proposed development!


The revised Angel Oak Village development plan is being presented for an information only hearing to elicit board comments on the general design direction. Though no vote will be taken, this is an important opportunity for the public to see the latest plan that endagers this landmark. Come see the development for yourself, and share your opinions with the Board.




Update: March 4, 2009


Final Report on the Effects of Developing Angel Oak Village

Prepared for Dana Beach, Coastal Conservation League
by Jean Everett, PhD, Department of Biology, College of Charleston


Summary:

The Angel Oak Village development plan, as I have thus far seen, is highly likely to cause irreparable harm to the Angel Oak, and result in the premature death of the tree. Most trees, live oaks included, have no set life span. They essentially live forever, unless killed by environmental factors. All trees have characteristics that make them more or less susceptible to negative environmental factors. Red maples, for example, have little defense against rot, and thus tend to succumb at young ages. Many other trees, including live oaks, develop rot resistant heartwood that helps them maintain structural integrity for longer periods of time. Development of the Angel Oak Village would cause too many environmental changes, all of which would have a negative impact on the Angel Oak. If the project is completed, the cumulative result will be intolerable degradation of the environment around the tree. Death may take years, or decades, but in my opinion, is certain to be considerably accelerated by the development.

Download Full Report: Angel_Oak_Report.pdf (4.4 MB)




Update: January 25, 2009


Thank you all so much for your support!
The Commercial Corridor Design Review Board unanimously denied Angel Oak Village’s application for conceptual design approval!

 

Last Thursday Charleston’s Commercial Corridor Design Review Board made a very wise and important decision.  They voted unanimously to reject a development proposal that threatens the Angel Oak Tree, and even the future of Johns Island.

The Board concluded that the Angel Oak Village, with its three and four story apartment buildings, was out of scale with the traditional settlement on Johns Island and, for that matter, with any rural village or town anywhere in the Lowcountry.  The street level drawings of the project looked more like the streets of downtown Atlanta, where buildings tower over the roads and sidewalks.

The Board is charged with determining whether the design of new projects, including height, scale and mass, are consistent with citizens’ visions and plans for the city.  In the case of Angel Oak Village, they must conform to the future vision for Johns Island.

Charleston city planner Christopher Morgan showed the board drawings of the types of buildings that conformed with the Johns Island plan.  They were all two story buildings with traditional Lowcountry architecture.  Then, inexplicably, he said that the city supported the Angel Oak Village project, even though the developer’s drawings and plans, with their enormous structures, had nothing in common with the city’s images.

The Board listened to more than one hour of presentations by the city, by the developer and his architects and engineers, and then to brief comments from members of the public who objected to the project.  When the presentations were over, each board member expressed his or her thoughts about the proposed Angel Oak Village.  Every one of them raised insightful points about the project’s impact on the Angel Oak and its lack of compatibility with the surroundings, the Johns Island plan, and the wishes of the community.

We were impressed and grateful that the board comprehensively addressed legal and factual questions and that they genuinely seemed to care about the future of Johns Island.

Their decision on Thursday opens the door for a positive resolution to the question of development on this site.  Those of us who have opposed the project look forward to working with the city and the developer on a design that is best for the community and for the Angel Oak.

We have three primary concerns about the project.  First, Angel Oak Village is simply too intense and massive to be on the edge of the urban growth boundary and next to this extraordinary tree.  We would like the developer to substantially reduce the density of the project.  Second, we would like him to protect the wetlands on the site, rather than filling more than four acres.  Third, we would like him to put a much larger buffer between the development and the Angel Oak.  A buffer that independent arborists and hydrologists agree will definitively protect the tree from any harm.

We pledge to work with the developer and the city to bring the best planning firm available to develop a new proposal that we can all support.  It is hard to imagine a place that is more worthy of this type of effort. 

What if we could, for the first time in history, begin to realize that human beings survival upon this planet within this vast and enormous universe depends only on how consciously we act to preserve and protect our environment?  All forms of life depend on each other.  Life attracts other life.  If we can all pull together to protect the Angel Oak, we will have proven that we can do the type of hard work necessary to protect the Lowcountry.  Furthermore, if the existence of the Angel Oak has proved anything, it has proved that anything is possible.

Never underestimate the power of a single letter to influence corporate decisions and sway public officials.  By speaking up, you will be heard.  It is so easy for people to look the other way and leave the problem for someone else to handle.  My hope is that we can all pull together to preserve this wonderful place that we call home; and in the end, we WILL win. 


 

 

THE REASON FOR THIS WEB SITE

The reasons we feel this development is a bad idea are endless. The Grand trees that are hundreds of years old will be lost forever along with the sounds of birds and insects that make up this wonderful place. The human impact of so many people living around the AO cannot be calculated or studied. Our Low Country has escaped much of the urban vandalism and graffiti seen in cities throughout the world and it is our concern that the AO will inherit this type of neglect if so many homes are built near it. We also feel that if such an important area like the AOP can fall prey to destruction and development so close to it's boundaries, then no protected area will be safe.

Look at theses unfinished homes just 2 miles from the Angel Oak.

Do we really need to clear out more forest?

 

The Angel Oak is located just under the word (park) in the photo above.

Large view of the proposed site plan rejected by Commercial Corridor Design Review Board

 

 

NEW TRAFFIC STUDY

 

AOV Traffic study - SRS Engineering

AOV will increase traffic on Bohicket Rd. (a SC Scenic Highway) by 8,420 two-way vehicular trips each week day.

LEVEL-OF-SERVICE SUMMARY
SITE ACCESS INTERSECTIONS
AOV
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time 2013 BUILD MITIGATED
Unsignalized Site Access Intersections Period Delay in Seconds Level of Service

Site Access #1 AM 13.4 B
Maybank at Sea Islands Health Care PM 14.3 B

Site Access #2 AM ** F
Bohicket Rd at Piggly Wiggly PM ** F

Site Access #3 AM >500.0 F
Bohicket Rd. at Haut Gap MS PM ** F

Site Access #4 AM 121.8 F
Bohicket Rd. at Kano Rd. PM 238.8 F


"Upon review, all feasible geometrics have been recommended at the site access intersections along Bohicket Road. No further intersection specific geometric enhancements exist which will provide for acceptable operating levels."

"The only potential intersection specific improvements option to allow for acceptable operating levels would be to implement traffic signal control at one of the Bohicket Road access intersections. Logically, only the Bohicket Road at Haut Gap MS Access/Site Access #3 intersection could be considered."

"Note that no additional traffic volume associated with the proposed school expansion has been accounted for at this time due to lack of information."

 

 

air

Click above to see close view of the dense forest.

 

 

 

THOUSANDS of trees (view list of Grand Tree) Will be cut down.

 

 

 

 

ANGEL OAK/ANGEL OAK VILLAGE TIMELINE

1991: The city of Charleston buys what is now Angel Oak Park, roughly 2 acres on a dirt road surrounding what's billed as the oldest living tree east of the Mississippi River.

2000: Sea Island Comprehensive Health Care, a nonprofit provider of services to low-income Sea Islands residents, proposes selling 42 undeveloped acres around Angel Oak Park because of financial problems.

2001: The state names Angel Oak South Carolina's Millennium Tree. Charleston's Planning Commission approves rezoning the Sea Island property to allow a grocery story, office buildings and apartments.

2004: Sea Island seeks bankruptcy protection. In September, the city announces a plan to acquire 16 acres around Angel Oak Park for $1 million as part of a $3.5 million purchase of the entire property by Greenville developer Robert S. Small Jr. That deal falls through, and the land is bought by a different developer.

2005: With the sale of the land pending and Sea Island's bankruptcy reorganization hanging in the balance, Charleston insists on greater protection for Angel Oak than proposed by the buyers. The city threatens to buy all the land if the potential developers don't agree to concessions. After days of contentious public hearings, a deal is reached calling for a 150-foot buffer around Angel Oak Park, a 75-foot natural buffer along unpaved Angel Oak Road, an extra level of city review as the development proceeds, a 7-acre conservation zone around the park, and the hiring of a hydrologist and a tree expert. The development would include a large grocery store, shops and 285 housing units.

2008: Developers of what's become known as Angel Oak Village return to the city with revised plans that eliminate the big-box grocery store and increase the number of housing units to 600. The Planning Commission endorses the new plan and City Council approves it, over the course of three public meetings in May and July. In late July, Samantha Siegel launches an online petition drive opposing the development.

 

 

 

A few quotes from the petition:

9:35 pm PDT, Sep 10, Mary P. Burke, South Carolina
Why Don't you all make a Park are something about the angle oak so people can enjoy it like for tourist to come and sight see. who want to see a bunch of houses and years later a run down shopping mall I sure don't. make something people will " ENJOY

8:52 pm PDT, Sep 10, Richard Sutton, South Carolina
Come on, please look at this petition. What parts of our heritage will be left when the developers are done having their way. The charm that make this place, our home, so wonderful and magical a place is slowly being eroded to accommodate "johnny come lately's" when there are in fact plenty of places that are empty already. Please encourage developers to go somewhere else.

7:19 pm PDT, Sep 10, Pamela Carver, South Carolina
The Angel Oak deserves all the space and care it needs. What has the world come to that putting up duplicate buildings & taking away such a beautiful gift from God is even considered. We need to re-examine our priorities when more development has a higher priority not just for the Angel Oak but the other surrounding trees.Please protect this landmark area.

6:47 pm PDT, Sep 10, Brandi Bruorton, South Carolina
I have lived in Charleston my whole life. Angel Oak was one of my favorite field trips as a child. I cannot imagine my son not having the same amazing opportunity as I did to witness up close and personal the majesty and beauty that this land has to offer. Angel Oak and it's surroundings are so amazing and so rare in our town that I am appalled that anyone would consider changing any part of that property!

5:44 pm PDT, Sep 10, Name not displayed, South Carolina
Are you kidding me..this entire area is a historic area!!

4:06 pm PDT, Sep 10, Ivan Curry, South Carolina
Charleston's beauty is what attracts people to visit. Respect Charleston/SC and its beauty. Before you know only the ugly will exist in SC.

3:28 pm PDT, Sep 10, Randall Goldman, South Carolina
We are the care takers of these historic trees and find it appalling to think that someone would consider selling off these irreplaceable assets. As owners and operators of the William Aiken House and Lowndes Grove we understand the importance these trees have on our community. I plead to the developers to reconsider this course of action.

Sep 10, 2008, Stephen Oswanski, South Carolina
Please plan to co-exist with this interesting, unique species in nature or find another location (perhaps where buildings need restoration) to place your buildings. The laws in place protect these trees for a reason. Don't try and undo someones steps toward protecting a naturally rich environment.

 

 

What can you do?

Call or write with your concern and or comments.

Don't let Charleston's greatest natural treasure become the center piece for a housing project.

Mayor Joseph P. Riley, Jr.
P. O. Box 652
Charleston, SC 29402
rileyj@ci.charleston.sc.us

Greg Wahl, MS
Ocean and Coastal Resource Management
1362 Mc Millan Ave. Suite 400
Charleston, SC 29405
Phone 843-953-0242
Fax 843-953-0201
wahlgt@dhec.sc.gov

 

 
AngelOakTree.org

contact us: info@savetheangeloak.com